Vikings: “Burial of the Dead”

My brother doesn’t hold grudges. He’s strange that way.” – Rollo

“Burial of the Dead” is a rewarding episode of Vikings, and probably the show’s best to date. The season-long conflict between Ragnar and Earl Haraldson finally reaches its climax, appropriately in the form of a personal combat — a one-on-one fight to the death.

Predetermination is a recurring theme in this episode, and that is what drives Ragnar to propose the personal combat and why Haraldson ultimately agrees to it, despite the obvious risks. Ragnar, remember, is still wounded from last week’s attack on his farm by Haraldson and his thugs, and as his wife, Lagertha, reminds him (during sex, of course), he’s departing from Viking rules of combat by fighting while the odds aren’t in his favor. Believing himself to be destined for greatness, Ragnar is OK with taking this liberty.

As Haraldson prepares, and faces the very real possibility of his own impending death, he comes clean to his wife about his efforts to stifle Ragnar. He knew Ragnar was probably right about the lands to the West, and even concedes that Ragnar is not unlike a younger version of himself — driven and ambitious. He stood in Ragnar’s way merely in the interest of preserving his own power, he explains. But now, finally, he’s willing to submit his will to fate, whatever it may be.

Ragnar wins the showdown, and even in a bloody victory over his mortal rival, his actions underscore why he has risen to power and usurped Haraldson. Rather than spike the proverbial football, Ragnar plays it earnestly. After incapacitating Haraldson with an axe to the back, Ragnar mercifully kills him simply by opening his wrist with the blade of the axe. He’d have been well within his rights to do something horrific after what Haraldson had pulled (and I suspect much of the audience was pulling for that), but again: spiking the football. Haraldson’s wife tries futilely to stem the flow of blood, but Haraldson brushes her away. He’s at peace with his fate — an honorable death in battle is the optimal way to go.

Of course, it is Ragnar who affords Haraldson this honorable death, and it is Ragnar who decides Haraldson should get an elaborate funeral on a burning boat. Athelstan, our eyes and ears on the ground, asks Ragnar the question everyone watching at home is asking: Why go to these lengths for a villainous old man, your mortal enemy?

“He was also a great man — and warrior,” Ragnar says. “He earned his renown in this life, and now in death he deserves such a funeral.”

If you’re thinking Ragnar is a hell of a guy at this point, well, he is. Even his half-evil brother Rollo understands this:

“My brother doesn’t hold grudges. He’s strange that way.”

This is what Rollo tells Haraldson’s widow while she’s lining her pockets with treasure in anticipation of being cast into exile — or worse. You can’t blame her for fearing the worst now that her husband is dead and she’s out of office, but Rollo — his face badly scarred from last week’s torture incident at the hands of Haraldson — assures her she’ll be allowed to live a normal life. Rollo seems like a swell gent to be so compassionate, but soon he reveals to her his real intentions: He thinks he’ll be earl. He doesn’t know how or by what means, but hey, predestination has a funny way of taking care of those things. Or not.

So begins the new chapter in Ragnar’s life, replete with a new set of challenges. Haraldson is dead, and so it stands to reason his sibling rivalry with Rollo will come into focus. Ragnar also has another baby on the way; Lagertha tells him that she’s with child at Haraldson’s funeral, a nice bit of symmetry, albeit an easy one.  Joffrey Baratheon Bjorn, meanwhile, is becoming increasingly obnoxious, having a couple cross exchanges with Athelstan and throwing a tantrum when Ragnar tells him he’s not yet ready to join the Viking men on their next raid. You’ll be a man some day, Bjorn. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the hapless Northumbrians are growing increasingly leery of Viking raids. As the episode ends, Ragnar and a crew of his men sail up an English river in search of plunder. King Aella, meanwhile, shows off his new toy, a snake pit. He tests it out on a soldier who failed to halt Ragnar the last time the Vikings paid a visit. Turns out, it works.

Ragnar’s innumerable virtues — bravery, grace, wisdom, pragmatism, to name a few — have gotten him to where he is. But that was when he was merely the people’s earl. Now, he really is the earl. Will the same virtues serve him as well in his new role? For example, while taking his seat as earl, he grants a purposeless old Viking his wish to join the younger men on their next raid — to do the only thing he’s ever done. But perhaps Ragnar’s sympathy for the warrior will haunt him if the old timer is a weak link in battle.

- Athelstan, meanwhile, sees a lot in this terrific episode, because a lot of new ground is covered: the personal combat; the preparation and later sacrifice of one of Haraldson’s female slaves; the boat burning; the swearing-in of Ragnar and his family; the Ragnarok. His reactions serve to show what a great and interesting character he is. Really, he doesn’t bring much to the forward movement of the show’s story one way or the other, but his constant sense of wonder (and shock, and appall, etc.) at the foreign world in which he’s immersed is a mirror for ours. He’s getting by among the Vikings just fine, but he’s no Viking, to be sure.

- The slave bit, in particular, is especially jarring for the monk, as you might imagine. First, he witnesses her entering a house full of men where she’ll have sex with all of them, then he’s forced by Bjorn to see her sacrificed (by throat-slitting) at the hands of a new female character, the creepy Angel of Death. It almost played like comic relief when he crossed himself and kissed his cross necklace as the sacrifice neared.

- The personal combat is a barbaric way to resolve a conflict, at least to us, but one the Viking community sees as acceptable and, indeed, honorable. To me, that dissonance — and how it challenges us, the viewers — is what distinguishes Vikings as a really good show in its own right, rather than just being a medieval heroic saga riding the coattails of Game of Thrones.

- There’s only a brief buildup to the combat, which transpires only about a quarter of the way through the episode. This was a wise choice after the relative lull of the second half of last week’s episode, when Ragnar retreats to Floki’s house to heal.

- Despite his injuries, Ragnar defeats Haraldson in the personal combat. The injuries might have been the only way to raise any doubt about who might win such a confrontation — seriously, who ya got between the decorated-warrior hero and the old man? — but that’s almost beside the point. If the outcome was obvious (and I think it was), then the renewed focus on all those foreign cultural customs, and how they imbue the characters’ behaviors before, during, and after the main event is what made this hugely important scene, and the rest of the episode, compelling.

You Will Love Bryce Harper

Bryce Harper debuted for the Nationals tonight. His ascent to the Majors has been swift, but relative to how long we’ve been hearing about him, it’s taken a lifetime.

This is the kid whose career has been as shrewdly orchestrated as Guy MacKendrick’s. He had an “agent” when regular kids were having their first kisses and beers. He was on the cover of SI as a high schooler. He gamed MLB’s silly draft rules by pitstopping at a junior college for a year.

And to further enhance the fabricated villain angle, he looks and occasionally acts like an utter douche. He has a mohawk and sometimes an ironic mustache. He wears too much eye black. He blew a kiss at an opposing pitcher after hitting a homer last year. He’s not handsome but has a jaw cut from stone and blue eyes like a Siberian Husky, the kind of pronounced features that make you look at them and try to figure out where the hell they came from.

What’s not to hate about that? It smacks of Brycie having been manufactured into some kind of contrived caricature by his parents in an epic fit of creepy stagemomery.

So, the-guy-you’ll-love-to-hate narrative was in place. But after being treated by Harper to an astonishing athletic display, I can’t help but to call bullshit on that.

Harper plays his ass off, and he is a physical marvel. To watch him run is captivating; his speed is impressive but his stride severe, like an all-out-effort guy’s.  He possesses what is undoubtedly the next great arm, and he is aggressive with it (there’s a mentality that must accompany having such an arm so it may be wielded correctly, and Harper owns it). His swing is tremendously powerful, the action of it like a tightly wound spring uncoiling to create a violent bat whip.

Harper is 19, and he is a talent that typically finds its way to the NFL or NBA. But he is aware of this. He’s a showman but only because he understands that people want to see the extraordinary things he can do on a baseball field. He self-consciously busted to first base on a no-chance comebacker in his first at-bat. It was a sure sign that he wouldn’t cheat his many curious onlookers when he broke into a sprint despite his obvious fate of being beaten to the bag by a good two strides.

The home-team Dodgers fans in attendance were not easy on Harper as he was introduced for that first at-bat, but I sensed his later feats softened them if not because they realized they were seeing something special, then certainly because they were simply awed dumb.

The game itself was terrific, with only the equally impressive athlete Matt Kemp ending it all on a walkoff home run to slightly right of center field. I don’t think the baseballpornmongers had entirely forgotten about Kemp during Harper’s show, but the former certainly insinuated himself into what was otherwise his first game this season in which he was not the only player belonging to a better talent planet.

I love Harper right now, and I really hope he doesn’t change that by trademarking the helmet takeoff between first and second base.

At The Summit Of His Art

I came across this French-language column about Gary Carter in my Twitter feed, and, for reasons I can’t explain, I decided to dust off the few vestiges of my high school French in attempt to read it.

Needless to say, even with the help of my French-to-English dictionary app I spent about a half-hour slogging through the first few paragraphs. However, luckily for me, one sentence that came relatively easily was this beauty:

From 1979 to 1982, the Expos compiled the best record in the National League with 331 wins against 261 defeats, and Carter was at the summit of his art.

That third clause is a charming turn of phrase, one you simply wouldn’t see in English, at least not in the context of baseball. If the author, Denis Casavant, were American or had written this in English, he’d have written something like, “and Carter was at the height of his game.”

Close, but not close at all, right?

Mariano Rivera’s Saves Title

As you know by now, Mariano Rivera surpassed Trevor Hoffman as MLB’s all-time saves leader earlier this month. It was a notable feat, to be sure, but in a game that values numbers and milestones so highly, it was a decidedly muted occasion relative to, say, Barry Bonds passing Hank Aaron or Cal Ripken Jr. passing Lou Gehrig. Undoubtedly, that’s partly because the value of the “closer” is still widely debated, and therefore saves are a dubious, if not altogether laughable, stat. But more than that, Mariano earning his 602nd career save did next to nothing to change the way we think about him or how he’ll be remembered — his legacy, as it were.

I say that in sheer reverence, of course. Mariano Rivera was already the greatest closer — certainly since the closer’s role has taken on its current shape, and probably ever — and everyone knew that. He would have been the greatest closer with or without this distinction, the way Ted Williams is the best hitter despite not hitting the most homers or owning the highest batting average. Just to be clear, there are plenty of stats to support Mo as the greatest closer, if we wanted to take it there. We could fall back on his 38.6 career WAR, for example, which is roughly nine more wins above replacement (in 287 fewer innings) than the next closest reliever, Goose Gossage.

But the point is, we don’t need to refer to those numbers.

When I think about Rivera’s greatness, about boiling it down to something simple and human, I’m reminded of a tweet I read a year or so ago. I can’t remember whose tweet it was, so if you read this piece and want to lay claim to it, by all means. The person tweeted something like: “There is no greater comfort in fandom than having Rivera take the mound in the ninth inning.” I’m pretty sure time and my mutable memory have conspired to tweak that a bit, but nevertheless that line summarizes Mariano Rivera’s greatness more than 603 career regular-season saves, 42 postseason saves, ~40 WAR, 2.76 FIP, that hellacious cutter or whatever other measure you want to use.

When Mariano Rivera enters a game to close it out, he instills in everyone — his team, manager(s), fans and, yes, his fantasy owners — a sort of confidence that the subsequent three outs are all but a formality. Of course, Mo has had his down moments. Game 7 of the 2001 World Series is the most obvious. Game 4 of the 2004 ALCS isn’t far behind. The Matt Franco Game is a personal favorite of this Mets fan. But what he has done is survive the inevitable losing battle against the law of averages and forge ahead with his own confidence, and everyone else’s trust in him, intact. It didn’t matter that he wasn’t always perfect; no one is, after all. It only mattered that we expected him to be perfect, and thought him fully capable of achieving that, every time out.

And that, for practical purposes, is really the thing that separates Mo from the other great relievers, of which there have been so many. No matter the pitcher, year, team and situation, all stoppers, however brilliant their respective stretches, gave their fans that momentary pause when they entered the game, that maybe this would be the day that they just didn’t quite have it. Maybe Hoffman’s changeup wouldn’t be quite as deceptive. Maybe Nen’s slider wouldn’t fall off the table. Maybe Wagner’s speeding bullet would be a little bit easier to square up.

No one ever thought that about No. 42 and whether his patented cutter would bite. And on the days when it was catching too much plate, and some team managed to escape certain defeat, no one questioned whether he’d be back to normal next time out. And that’s the indefinable thing that renders the saves crown redundant, if not irrelevant. The number — 603 and counting — tells us what we already knew.

Stephen Strasburg’s Debut

I was working overnights at this time last year, when Stephen Strasburg completed his ascent from laughably dominant college pitcher to perfunctory Minor Leaguer to magnetic force around whom baseball revolved on a bathwater-warm night in Washington. In retrospect, maybe that — my foray into nocturnal living — is what made Strasburg’s debut (and his too-brief stint in the bigs) feel like a dream.

On June 10, 2010, I hopped on the 12:53 a.m. train westbound to New York as I did on many other nights. I was camped out with my bag, coffee, peanut butter and jelly, soy yogurt, banana, Pepsi Throwback, iPhone (listening to The Roots’ How I Got Over) and computer for the hour-plus ride. The car in which I rode was empty save for a deadbeat who couldn’t pay his fare, and it was littered with reminders of its barrenness. A few half-empty beer cans were tipped on their sides, rolling to the front and back of the car each time the train started and stopped. A breakman had emptied his hole-punch so that ticket parings were strewn like confetti on the seat across the aisle from mine. And, of course, yesterday’s Newsday was gutted like fresh catch on a deck, its sections ruffled and discarded like unwanted entrails.

Despite the lifelessness of the setting, I was electrified and jittery. Maybe it was the coffee, but I like to think it was Strasburg. He had arrived and surpassed the immense expectations, striking out 14 batters. And I had a chance to write something about him, however insignificant. I knew then that no one would read it, and I’m sure no one did, but I didn’t care and still don’t. I had a chance to archive my marginalized existence in relation to this unlikely spectacle — a midseason game between the Pirates and Nationals — in a very small way.

Of course, Strasburg remained a story throughout the summer, but I slept through a lot of it, literally. I checked box scores, sure, but as I said, I was nocturnal then. I was only waking up when games began on the East Coast, so I was showering and eating and spending time with my obscenely patient girlfriend during those hours. There was always this disconnect, this feeling that I had just barely missed all the excitement.

And then, Strasburg had elbow pain, and anyone remotely interested in baseball experienced that crippling momentary dysphoria. The worst was confirmed, and Strasburg underwent Tommy John surgery, and his narrative shifted. For a short while he was the talking point for a tired debate, and then he receded into nothingness, into invisibility. That kid — that awkward kid — was gone. The tree-trunk legs and blood-red socks and steel-blue eyes all gone for at least a year and probably more, and no one could be sure what he’d be once he returned.

Now, Strasburg is just a grainy ghost in the baseball consciousness. And I want him to come back and be as good as he was on June 9, 2010, if only to confirm that I hadn’t dreamed all of it.

Carlos Beltran’s Gait

Carlos Beltran's gracefull stride will soon exist only in our memories and on SNY's Mets Classics (AP).

On several occasions during Carlos Beltran’s seven-year tenure with the Mets, I have heard colorful (and sometimes off-color) analyst Keith Hernandez admire Beltran’s gait.

It is an odd thing to admire of a ballplayer. Typically, it’s his raw power or hose-like throwing arm or sharp eye or blazing speed. But, Hernandez, God love him, is a noted admirer of Beltran’s gait, his running stride. It’s one of the qualities I like about Hernandez as an analyst: For all his sometimes off-putting antics, he’s also honest, secure in his unorthodoxy, and he appreciates many of the game’s nuances.

But it spoke to something greater about Beltran and the way he is perceived among Mets fans and pundits, because if you liked Beltran — if you chose to focus on his 20 WAR from 2006-08, chiefly — you were probably admiring his gait right along with Hernandez.

If you didn’t like Beltran, you probably weren’t interested in admiring his gait. You probably thought Beltran was overpaid, passionless, soft, injury-prone, un-clutch, timid when the team needed leaders, unwilling to play a shallower center field, and, in contrast to Hernandez’s point, maybe even a loafer.

Indeed, for a man who was at times an immensely productive player and a non-entity off the field, Beltran has been a tellingly polarizing figure. It is entirely a matter of perception, really, as to which side of the argument you fall on.

And the objective information is becoming such that it is difficult to make an overwhelmingly compelling argument either way.

As recently as mid-2009, there wasn’t much of an argument, really. Sure, there was Beltran’s disappointing first season in New York, and he had to be forced to take a curtain call early in 2006, and he struck out (looking) to end the ’06 NLCS. But these were all fluffy criticisms, grist for the sabermetric mill. The guy was a flat-out stud. Over the first four years of his deal, he was paid $52.5MM. According to Fangraphs, he was worth roughly $87MM in that period.

Absolving Beltran of blame for the Mets’ travails rightfully became something of a cause celebre among progressive types, and it still is.

But, of course, the combined forces of age and injury quickly eroded Beltran’s stock from that of a stalwart to that of a liability. Although he was on pace for another 6-WAR season in 2009, he became injured, which carried into 2010. He was worth only 4 WAR in 144 games in those two seasons, and with his contract back-heavy, as most are, he was suddenly in an unseemly phase of his long-term deal, the one in which the player’s compensation exceeds his production.

And now, as he embarks on what will almost assuredly be his last season with the Mets, Beltran is perhaps staring at another injury-marred campaign, which would be his fourth in seven with the Amazin’s. He has already deemed himself unfit to play center field, which can’t bode especially well for the condition of his surgically repaired knees, not to mention that the value derived from his defensive contributions will likely be negligible if not negative.

We can’t assume anything, of course, about how Beltran will fare in 2011, but expectations are tempered. Another disappointing season — one in which Beltran’s hefty salary continues to loom over the cash-strapped Mets — will do little in the way of establishing a common interpretive ground between the divided factions.

Looking at compensation relative to value, Beltran is pretty close to having earned every dollar the Mets have paid him. He has been paid approximately $100MM of his $119MM deal so far, with the Mets owing him $18.5MM this season, according to Cot’s Baseball Contracts. He has been worth approximately $105MM to date, meaning he’ll need a “value” of about $14MM in 2011 for the contract to be an even wash. Glancing back at prior years, I noticed that he was worth exactly that amount in 2009, when he posted a 3.1 WAR. So, assuming WAR can be approximated in such a way, Beltran will need to be worth about 3 WAR in 2011 to have met the dollar value of his contract. He was worth 3.1 WAR in 2009 when he played in only 81 games, mind you, so it is reasonable to believe he can achieve that in 2011 if he plays in more games.

Even still, it’s pretty close. So, it’s hard to argue that Beltran hasn’t earned the big contract the Mets committed to him prior to the 2005 campaign. He is already among the top five or six position players in Mets history, which speaks to the brilliance of his performance from 2006-08 (when he was the best center fielder in baseball) as well as the Mets’ spotty history with developing and retaining position players. To boot, he’s the best center fielder in club history by a healthy margin.

Beltran’s production was incredibly top-heavy throughout his first six years in New York, his all-or-nothing wares unsurprisingly mirroring those of the Mets. That he was the best all-around player on three teams that were good but ultimately disappointing undoubtedly says less about Beltran, in any context, and more about how the Mets were flimsily constructed.

Typically, the nature of long-term contracts is such that the team over-commits in both years and dollars for the prospect of riding the elite player, in his prime, to something great. Beltran was, in fact, elite in three of his first four years in New York, but the Mets did not achieve something great. And just the way Mets fans rue that the great teams of the mid-1980s did not establish themselves as a dynasty with more than one World Series, I sense they feel similarly about the mid-aughts Amazin’s, to whom Beltran is inextricably bound.

It’s fitting, then, that Beltran will have been worth little more or less than the big money the Mets committed to him. The rest is a matter of perception, like whether you admire his gait.

Reflecting on Griffey, a 16-Bit Console Hero

Note: I published this several months back at a now-defunct blog, so I’ve imported it here for the sake of preserving a decent piece.

Throughout my early adolescence, I spent countless summer days whipping my cousin Pete in Ken Griffey Jr. Presents Major League Baseball for Super Nintendo.

With bathing suits wet, fingers pruned and eyes red from the swimming pool’s chlorine, we’d shuffle into a corner of my bedroom and fix our attention to the tiny 13-inch tube television on which our epic battles would unfold.

Fittingly, Griffey’s was the only real name used in the game. Its developers didn’t acquire the licensing rights from the MLB Players Association to use other players’ names, so everyone but Griffey had a fictitious, often silly title. Intentions notwithstanding, the effect was all the same: Griffey was baseball’s — and the video game’s — biggest star.

He was baseball’s final pre-Internet icon, a player who was as cool as he was gifted. With Griffey’s ridiculous hype and marvelous performance, Mariners fans — showing their solidarity with teal-green caps worn backward — were suddenly cropping up across the country.

Buried beneath the rubble of Armando Galarraga’s imperfect game on June 2 was the news of Griffey’s retirement, not a where-were-you moment but perhaps a take-a-step-back moment for a generation of fans.

For all Griffey’s greatness and popularity, the anticlimactic ending seemed fitting for a career marred in its second half by injuries and overshadowed by the homer happiness of the steroids era (the strike of 1994-95 did him no favors, either). The final 10 or so seasons were nearly as unremarkable as the first 10 were celebrated.

Baseball tragedies are often mistakenly compared to their real-life counterparts, and Griffey’s fate is hardly that. He made millions, foolishly forced his way out of a city in which he was nothing short of a god, and frequently was his own worst enemy due to his aloofness and hypersensitivity. All this considered, Junior’s still a surefire Hall of Famer, headed for Cooperstown on on the first ballot barring a PED revelation.

But there is a palpable somberness — morbidity, even — among those who followed baseball closely or worshiped Griffey or played his quaint 16-bit video game, because despite 630 career homers and 10 Gold Gloves at a premium defensive position, we are left with the dull nag of what could have been for a transcendent talent.

It speaks to something larger about us as devourers of baseball, that despite the increased emphasis on stats over the past decade, we still relish stories and memories, and Griffey left us short on both when he promised so many.

Perhaps the feeling is simply indicative of an affection unique to a particular generation of fans, one that some may not understand if they didn’t grow up watching the early SportsCenter before hopping on the school bus (because that was the only way to watch Griffey highlights). More likely, though, it’s rooted in the realization that Griffey’s retirement was the long-overdue death knell for a zeitgeist that met its end in 1998, when Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa, and later Barry Bonds, rendered Griffey all but an afterthought.

Griffey’s career spanned parts of 22 seasons, peaking three Nintendo consoles ago, to be exact, and it’s sadly and humorously fitting that for a guy who couldn’t keep up with the game — a bit by his own doing, a bit not — the last story of intrigue he provided was an in-game nap.